U.S. v. Siegel, No. 97-4461 (11th Cir.) (153 F.3d 1256) (September 4, 1998) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
Here the Court relied heavily on its earlier ruling in U.S. v. Remillong, 55 F.3d 572, 574 (11th Cir. 1995), and noted both that the defendant's presentence report had suggested that the defendant was unable to pay the $1,207,000 in restutution and that no fine was ordered due to the ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login