Skip navigation

U.S. v. Simmons, No. 97-4025 (8th Cir.) (154 F.3d 765) (August 17, 1998) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)

Here the Court wrote: "At the heart of Simmons's and Fisher's argument is a disagreement with the District Court and the government over what is meant by the term "proceeds" for purposes of the RICO statute's forfeiture provisions. Defendants who violate the RICO Act must forfeit "any property constituting, or ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login