Skip navigation

U.S. v. Eisenhardt, No. Crim. No. S 95-0468 (D.Md.) (10 F.Supp.2d 521) (August 3, 1998) (Judge Frederic N. Smalkin)

Here the Court called the Singleton ruling "amazingly unsound, not to mention nonsensical, especially in its creation ex nihilo of an exclusionary rule barring testimony from virtually every cooperating federal witness." (Id., at 521).

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login