Skip navigation

U.S. v. Saavedra, No. 96-4808 (11th Cir.) (148 F.3d 1311) (August 6, 1998) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)

This decision explores the interesting issue of whether a sentencing court may always use "relevant conduct", as defined in Sentencing Guidelines, to enhance a defendant's sentence regardless of the charges contained in the indictment; and the ruling in this case shows that, at least in some Circuits, there are some ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login