Arredondo v. U.S., No. 96-2126 (6th Cir.) (178 F.3d 778) (May 28, 1999) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
August 02, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Effective Assistance of Counsel.
The defendant in this case sought to vacate his drug conviction on the grounds that his counsel was ineffective, in part because his counsel had failed to tell him about a plea offer that had been made, and in part because his counsel had failed to object to the Government's ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 96-1823 (6th Cir.) (188 F.3d 354) (July 28, 1999) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- U.S. v. Triestman, No. 98-1021(L) (2nd Cir.) (178 F.3d 624) (June 2, 1999) (Judge Sonia Sotomayor)
- U.S. v. Berg, No. 98-2468 (8th Cir.) (178 F.3d 976) (May 27, 1999) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Ford, No. 97-6097 (6th Cir.) (184 F.3d 566) (July 23, 1999) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Berg, No. 98-2468 (8th Cir.) (178 F.3d 976) (May 27, 1999) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Corona-Maldonado, No. 97-40041-01-DES (D.Kan.) (46 F.Supp.2d 1171) (April 14, 1999) (Judge Dale E. Saffels)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 96-1823 (6th Cir.) (188 F.3d 354) (July 28, 1999) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- U.S. v. Makki, No. Crim. No. 98-0334(PLF) (D.D.C.) (47 F.Supp.2d 25) (April 20, 1999) (Judge Paul L. Friedman)
- U.S. v. Tidwell, No. 98-2710 (7th Cir.) (178 F.3d 946) (May 28, 1999) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Pickering, No. 96-5464 (11th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1168) (June 25, 1999) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Ruiz, No. 98-1698 (7th Cir.) (178 F.3d 877) (May 17, 1999) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Conde, No. 98-1364 (2nd Cir.) (178 F.3d 616) (June 2, 1999) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Pickering, No. 96-5464 (11th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1168) (June 25, 1999) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Du Bo, No. 97-10443 (9th Cir.) (186 F.3d 1177) (August 10, 1999) (Judge Robert R. Beezer)
- U.S. v. Craig, No. 98-2252 (7th Cir.) (178 F.3d 891) (May 20, 1999) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Townsend, No. 98-3041 (D.C. Cir.) (178 F.3d 558) (June 11, 1999) (Judge David B. Sentelle)
- Arredondo v. U.S., No. 96-2126 (6th Cir.) (178 F.3d 778) (May 28, 1999) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Kimble, No. 97-5998 (11th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1163) (June 22, 1999) (Judge Rosemary Barkett)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 98-6377 (3rd Cir.) (186 F.3d 290) (August 9, 1999) (Judge Joseph F. Jr. Weis)
- U.S. v. Mett, No. 97-10504 (9th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1058) (June 1, 1999) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Ford, No. 97-6097 (6th Cir.) (184 F.3d 566) (July 23, 1999) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Head, No. 98-8491 (11th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1205) (June 25, 1999) (Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch)
- U.S. v. Ford, No. 97-6097 (6th Cir.) (184 F.3d 566) (July 23, 1999) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 96-1823 (6th Cir.) (188 F.3d 354) (July 28, 1999) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 96-1823 (6th Cir.) (138 F.3d 616) (March 11, 1998) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Affirms Habeas Relief Granted to Capital Defendant Where Counsel Failed to Impeach State’s Pivotal Wit-ness with Available Forensic Evidence, Jan. 15, 2024. AEDPA, Effective Assistance of Counsel, Counsel - Effective Assistance of, Strickland Standard, Identification Documents/Evidence, Failure to Consult/Investigate/Raise, Trial Strategy, Strickland v. Washington.
- U.S. Supreme Court Apparently Prioritizes Ideology Over Guilt or Innocence, Jan. 15, 2024. AEDPA, Procedural Default/Error, Proving Cause, Capital Cases, Procedural Error, Effective Assistance of Counsel, Counsel - Right to, Counsel - Effective Assistance of, Strickland Standard, Per se ineffectiveness, Right to Counsel.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.