Skip navigation

Taylor v. U.S., No. 97-16069 (9th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1017) (June 18, 1999) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)

In this lengthy review of the provisions of the PLRA which allow termination of consent decrees, a divided en banc court ultimately held that the motion to terminate was "moot", thus vacating the Court's earlier decision reported at 143 F.3d 1178.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login