U.S. v. Butch, No. Crim. No. 98-390 (D.N.J.) (48 F.Supp.2d 453) (May 3, 1999) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
This case is noted for its review of the standards that apply to the admission of "similar acts" evidence under Rule 404(b) and for its rejection of the Government's motion to exclude evidence under Rule 608(b) that a key witness had lied.
The Court noted that Rule 404(b) "does not ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login