Skip navigation

U.S. v. Garrett, No. 96-50609 (9th Cir.) (179 F.3d 1143) (August 16, 1999) (Judge Harry Pregerson)

Citing Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1, 11 (1983), the Court held that the Supreme Court does not require either the defendant or the government to establish a compelling reason to obtain a continuance. To the extent that United States v. Lillie, 989 F.2d 1054, 1056 (9th Cir. 1993), and ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login