U.S. v. Medina, No. 97-50148 (9th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1078) (June 22, 1999) (Judge Edward Leavy)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
August 30, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Exclusionary Rule.
In Elkins, the Supreme Court rejected the so-called "silver platter doctrine" which holds that evidence illegally seized by state officials can be admitted in a Federal criminal proceeding, so long as the Federal officials did not participate in the original illegal seizure by the State. The Supreme Court held that ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Schreiber, No. 98-1462 (2nd Cir.) (191 F.3d 103) (September 2, 1999) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
- Delgado v. Lewis, No. 97-56162 (9th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1087) (June 23, 1999) (Judge Sidney R. Thomas)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 93-3059 (D.C. Cir.) (181 F.3d 147) (July 13, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Medina, No. 97-50148 (9th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1078) (June 22, 1999) (Judge Edward Leavy)
- U.S. v. Cook, No. 98-2581 (11th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1232) (July 20, 1999) (Judge Jr. Julian Abele Cook)
- U.S. v. Shuler, No. 99-1060 (10th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1188) (July 6, 1999) (Judge James E. Barrett)
- U.S. v. Payne, No. 98-5197 (6th Cir.) (181 F.3d 781) (June 22, 1999) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Lara, No. 97-2215 (1st Cir.) (181 F.3d 183) (June 30, 1999) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Jackson, No. 98-2025 (7th Cir.) (189 F.3d 502) (August 24, 1999) (Judge John L. Coffey)
- U.S. v. Colorado Supreme Court, No. 98-1081 (10th Cir.) (189 F.3d 1281) (September 1, 1999) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Aker, No. 98-1900 (1st Cir.) (181 F.3d 167) (June 28, 1999) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 97-2111 (6th Cir.) (181 F.3d 794) (June 23, 1999) (Judge Leroy J. Jr. Contie)
- Mueller v. Angelone, No. 98-31 (4th Cir.) (181 F.3d 557) (June 14, 1999) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
- Taylor v. U.S., No. 97-16069 (9th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1017) (June 18, 1999) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 97-20443 (5th Cir.) (181 F.3d 627) (July 15, 1999) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Kyllo, No. 96-30333 (9th Cir.) (190 F.3d 1041) (September 9, 1999) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, No. 98-16950 (9th Cir.) (190 F.3d 1109) (September 13, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Messino, No. 99-1674 (7th Cir.) (181 F.3d 826) (June 22, 1999) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Hawkins, No. 98-3318 (8th Cir.) (181 F.3d 911) (June 28, 1999) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- U.S. v. Kyllo, No. 96-30333 (9th Cir.) (190 F.3d 1041) (September 9, 1999) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
More from these topics:
- Oregon Parole Hearing Exclusion Rule Invalidated, Sept. 15, 2023. Parole Board Misconduct, Murder/Felony Murder, Exclusionary Rule, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release.
- Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies There Is No Per Se Rule Excluding Self-Serving Hearsay, Sept. 1, 2023. Pro Se Issues, Hearsay Evidence, Exclusionary Rule.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Good-Faith Exception to Exclusionary Rule Inapplicable to Warrant Based on Affidavit Stating Cellphones Found at Scene of Traffic Crash ‘May’ Contain Evidence, May 15, 2023. Traffic Stops, Good Faith Exception, Exclusionary Rule.
- California Supreme Court Announces Predicate Offenses for Gang Enhancement or Gang Participation Not Provable Using Expert Witness Testimony Without Personal Knowledge of Facts, Sept. 15, 2021. Opinions and Expert Testimony, Gang Membership, Exclusionary Rule.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.