U.S. v. Messino, No. 99-1674 (7th Cir.) (181 F.3d 826) (June 22, 1999) (Judge William J. Bauer)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
August 30, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Conflict of Interest.
Here the Seventh Circuit held that the district court had abused its discretion by excluding the testimony of a Government witness in order to remedy an attorney conflict of interest, holding that the attorney should have been excluded.
In this case the Seventh Circuit held that the district court (Judge ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Schreiber, No. 98-1462 (2nd Cir.) (191 F.3d 103) (September 2, 1999) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
- Delgado v. Lewis, No. 97-56162 (9th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1087) (June 23, 1999) (Judge Sidney R. Thomas)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 93-3059 (D.C. Cir.) (181 F.3d 147) (July 13, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Medina, No. 97-50148 (9th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1078) (June 22, 1999) (Judge Edward Leavy)
- U.S. v. Cook, No. 98-2581 (11th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1232) (July 20, 1999) (Judge Jr. Julian Abele Cook)
- U.S. v. Shuler, No. 99-1060 (10th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1188) (July 6, 1999) (Judge James E. Barrett)
- U.S. v. Payne, No. 98-5197 (6th Cir.) (181 F.3d 781) (June 22, 1999) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Lara, No. 97-2215 (1st Cir.) (181 F.3d 183) (June 30, 1999) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Jackson, No. 98-2025 (7th Cir.) (189 F.3d 502) (August 24, 1999) (Judge John L. Coffey)
- U.S. v. Colorado Supreme Court, No. 98-1081 (10th Cir.) (189 F.3d 1281) (September 1, 1999) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Aker, No. 98-1900 (1st Cir.) (181 F.3d 167) (June 28, 1999) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 97-2111 (6th Cir.) (181 F.3d 794) (June 23, 1999) (Judge Leroy J. Jr. Contie)
- Mueller v. Angelone, No. 98-31 (4th Cir.) (181 F.3d 557) (June 14, 1999) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
- Taylor v. U.S., No. 97-16069 (9th Cir.) (181 F.3d 1017) (June 18, 1999) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 97-20443 (5th Cir.) (181 F.3d 627) (July 15, 1999) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Kyllo, No. 96-30333 (9th Cir.) (190 F.3d 1041) (September 9, 1999) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, No. 98-16950 (9th Cir.) (190 F.3d 1109) (September 13, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Messino, No. 99-1674 (7th Cir.) (181 F.3d 826) (June 22, 1999) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Hawkins, No. 98-3318 (8th Cir.) (181 F.3d 911) (June 28, 1999) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- U.S. v. Kyllo, No. 96-30333 (9th Cir.) (190 F.3d 1041) (September 9, 1999) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
More from these topics:
- Massachusetts Supreme Court: Defense Counsel’s Overt Bias Against Own Client Constitutes Actual Conflict of Interest Requiring New Trial Without Need to Prove Prejudice, Dec. 15, 2023. Counsel - Constructive denial of, Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel.
- Texas Prosecutor Spent 20-Year Career Also Working as Law Clerk to Judges He Appeared Before, May 5, 2022. Attorney Misconduct, Conflict of Interest.
- Arizona Supreme Court: Trial Court’s Failure to Protect Defendant’s Right to Conflict-Free Counsel May Be Raised on Direct Appeal 16 Massachusetts Supreme Court: Error to Exclude Expert Testimony on Significance of Tattoo to Support Claim of Self-Defense, Aug. 15, 2021. Appealable Issues/Orders, Conflict of Interest.
- D.C. Circuit: Conflicted Counsel During Habeas Proceeding Requires Appointment of Conflict-Free Counsel, June 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, Conflict of Interest.
- "Kentucky Supreme Court: Hearing on Defense Counsel’s Fitness Is Critical Stage at Which Defendant Has Right to Be Present With Conflict-Free Counsel", March 15, 2021. Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.