U.S. v. Mett, No. 97-10504 (9th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1058) (June 1, 1999) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
August 02, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Attorney/Client.
This case is noted for its extensive discussion of the "fiduciary exception" to the attorney client privilege which, in the ERISA context, provides that an employer/fiduciary is disabled from asserting the privilege against plan beneficiaries.
The Court explained: "The fiduciary exception is rooted in two distinct rationales. See generally Rust ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 96-1823 (6th Cir.) (188 F.3d 354) (July 28, 1999) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- U.S. v. Triestman, No. 98-1021(L) (2nd Cir.) (178 F.3d 624) (June 2, 1999) (Judge Sonia Sotomayor)
- U.S. v. Berg, No. 98-2468 (8th Cir.) (178 F.3d 976) (May 27, 1999) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Ford, No. 97-6097 (6th Cir.) (184 F.3d 566) (July 23, 1999) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Berg, No. 98-2468 (8th Cir.) (178 F.3d 976) (May 27, 1999) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Corona-Maldonado, No. 97-40041-01-DES (D.Kan.) (46 F.Supp.2d 1171) (April 14, 1999) (Judge Dale E. Saffels)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 96-1823 (6th Cir.) (188 F.3d 354) (July 28, 1999) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- U.S. v. Makki, No. Crim. No. 98-0334(PLF) (D.D.C.) (47 F.Supp.2d 25) (April 20, 1999) (Judge Paul L. Friedman)
- U.S. v. Tidwell, No. 98-2710 (7th Cir.) (178 F.3d 946) (May 28, 1999) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Pickering, No. 96-5464 (11th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1168) (June 25, 1999) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Ruiz, No. 98-1698 (7th Cir.) (178 F.3d 877) (May 17, 1999) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Conde, No. 98-1364 (2nd Cir.) (178 F.3d 616) (June 2, 1999) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Pickering, No. 96-5464 (11th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1168) (June 25, 1999) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Du Bo, No. 97-10443 (9th Cir.) (186 F.3d 1177) (August 10, 1999) (Judge Robert R. Beezer)
- U.S. v. Craig, No. 98-2252 (7th Cir.) (178 F.3d 891) (May 20, 1999) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Townsend, No. 98-3041 (D.C. Cir.) (178 F.3d 558) (June 11, 1999) (Judge David B. Sentelle)
- Arredondo v. U.S., No. 96-2126 (6th Cir.) (178 F.3d 778) (May 28, 1999) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Kimble, No. 97-5998 (11th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1163) (June 22, 1999) (Judge Rosemary Barkett)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 98-6377 (3rd Cir.) (186 F.3d 290) (August 9, 1999) (Judge Joseph F. Jr. Weis)
- U.S. v. Mett, No. 97-10504 (9th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1058) (June 1, 1999) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Ford, No. 97-6097 (6th Cir.) (184 F.3d 566) (July 23, 1999) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Head, No. 98-8491 (11th Cir.) (178 F.3d 1205) (June 25, 1999) (Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch)
- U.S. v. Ford, No. 97-6097 (6th Cir.) (184 F.3d 566) (July 23, 1999) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 96-1823 (6th Cir.) (188 F.3d 354) (July 28, 1999) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- U.S. v. Coleman, No. 96-1823 (6th Cir.) (138 F.3d 616) (March 11, 1998) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
More from these topics:
- In New Jersey, Yet More Privileged Phone Calls Between Prisoners and Attorneys Recorded and Used by Prosecutors, July 1, 2024. Attorney Client, Attorney/Client, Recorded Calls.
- Eleventh Circuit Revives Claim Against Florida Jail That Forced Detainee to Scan Legal Mail Into Computer with Memory Chip, March 1, 2024. Jail Specific, Supervisory Liability, Municipal Liability, Legal Mail, First Amendment, rights, Attorney/Client.
- Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Asserting Attorney-Client Privilege for Communications from Jail, Including Texts Using Tablets, Aug. 1, 2022. Text Messages, Attorney/Client.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.