Skip navigation

U.S. v. Miller, No. 98-20340 (5th Cir.) (179 F.3d 961) (August 16, 1999) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

This is one of those "safety valve" cases that shows how the law can be twisted by savvy drug dealers. In this case the Court held that the defendant's untruthful statements about two prior, unrelated drug activities did not disqualify him from relief, under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, from the applicable ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login