Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rahman, No. 96-1044L (2nd Cir.) (189 F.3d 88) (August 16, 1999) (Per Curiam)

In this case, the Court held that, notwithstanding the apparent mandatory nature of U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2, a sentencing court may depart from the "stacking" provision of that section to impose concurrent sentences where the imposition of multiple stacked sentences based on similar conduct created "an aggravating or mitigating circumstance, of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login