Skip navigation

U.S. v. Shaw, No. 98-1454 (8th Cir.) (180 F.3d 920) (June 29, 1999) (Per Curiam)

The Court stated: "Because Chapter 7's policy statements are not binding, a revocation sentence exceeding the suggested range is just that, a sentence. It is not an "upward departure" because there is no binding guideline from which to depart. Although at an original sentencing proceeding a court must provide reasonable ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login