California Attorneys for Criminal Justice v. Butts, No. 97-56499 (9th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1039) (November 8, 1999) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
Loaded on Dec. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
December 27, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Miranda.
In this case the Court held that police officers who intentionally violate a suspect's rights under Miranda v. Arizona in order to obtain statements for impeachment purposes are not immune from a civil rights suit under 42 USC § 1983.
In this case the California Attorneys for Criminal Justice joined ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Martinez v. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate Dist., No. 98-7809 (U.S. Supreme Court) (528 U.S. 152; 120 S.Ct. 684) (January 12, 2000) (Justice Stevens)
- Illinois v. Wardlow, No. 98-1036 (U.S. Supreme Court) (528 U.S. 119; 120 S.Ct. 673) (January 12, 2000) (Justice Rehnquist)
- Maria v. McElroy, No. 98 CV 6596(JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (68 F.Supp.2d 206) (October 7, 1999) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Symington, No. 98-10070 (9th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1080) (June 22, 1999) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- Hawkins v. Freeman, No. 96-7539 (4th Cir.) (195 F.3d 732) (November 9, 1999) (Judge James Dickson Jr. Phillips)
- Cain v. Rock, No. Civ. Y-98-1930 (D.Md.) (67 F.Supp.2d 544) (October 14, 1999) (Judge Joseph H. Young)
- U.S. v. Gallo, No. 98-4381 (11th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1278) (November 17, 1999) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Cones, No. 99-1292 (7th Cir.) (195 F.3d 941) (October 28, 1999) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- California Attorneys for Criminal Justice v. Butts, No. 97-56499 (9th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1039) (November 8, 1999) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- A.C.L.U. v. Reno, No. 98-5591 (E.D.Pa.) (31 F.Supp.2d 473) (February 1, 1999) (Judge Lowell A. Jr. Reed)
- People's Mojahedin Org. of Iran v. Dept. of State, No. 97-1648 (D.C. Cir.) (182 F.3d 17) (June 25, 1999) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 98-3831 (8th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1018) (November 18, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Dickerson, No. 98-6452 (10th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1183) (October 20, 1999) (Judge Mary Beck Briscoe)
- U.S. v. Rodrigues, No. CRIM. A. CR-98-0686 (E.D.N.Y.) (68 F.Supp.2d 178) (September 28, 1999) (Judge David G. Trager)
- California Attorneys for Criminal Justice v. Butts, No. 97-56499 (9th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1039) (November 8, 1999) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- Kirby v. James, No. 98-6236 (11th Cir.) (195 F.3d 1285) (November 17, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Rhynes, No. 97-4465 (4th Cir.) (196 F.3d 207) (October 26, 1999) (Judge Alexander Jr. Williams)
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal: Defendant’s Conversation With Officers Not Consensual Based on Officers’ Positioning and Manner of Approaching Legally Parked Vehicle so Evidence Obtained Resulting From Conversation Must Be Suppressed, Aug. 15, 2024. Vehicle Searches, Consensual Encounters, Suppression, Miranda.
- Eleventh Circuit Reverses District Court’s Grant of Habeas Relief, Notes It’s ‘Murky on When Putting Two Suspects in a Room Together Qualifies as Interrogation Under Miranda’, July 15, 2024. AEDPA, Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Minors, Use of, Interrogation.
- Oregon Supreme Court Rules Police Questioning of Probationer in Probation Officer’s Secure Office Absent Miranda Warning Constitute ‘Compelling Circumstances’ and Suppresses Statements, June 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Interrogation, In Custody.
- First Circuit: Miranda Waiver Not Valid Where Interrogating Officer Answered ‘No’ to Defendant’s Question — ‘None of this can be used against me, can it?’, March 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, In-home, Right To Remain Silent, Interrogation, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- The Diminishment of Miranda Is Leading to False Confessions and Conviction of Innocents, Feb. 15, 2024. Commentary/Reviews, Wrongful Conviction, Confessions - Admissibility, Impeachment Evidence/Purposes, Miranda, Interrogation, In Custody, Confessions and Statements of Defendant, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- SCOTUS: § 1983 Claim Cannot Be Based on Violation of Miranda Because Not Tantamount to Violation of Fifth Amendment, Sept. 15, 2022. Fifth Amendment, Miranda.
- New Jersey Supreme Court: Defendant Did Not Voluntarily Waive Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Because Police Persistently Contradicted and Undermined Significance of Miranda During Interrogation, Aug. 15, 2022. Police Misconduct, Custodial Interrogations/Statements, Miranda.
- Oregon Court Rules Prisoner’s Admissions in Disciplinary Hearing Violate Miranda, But Harmlessly, Aug. 1, 2022. Self Incrimination, Miranda.
- Vermont Supreme Court: Under Totality of Circumstances, Police Interview of Defendant in Store Parking Lot Was ‘Custodial Interrogation,’ Triggering Requirement for Miranda Warnings, May 1, 2022. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.
- California Court of Appeal: Police Created Atmosphere of Custodial Interrogation Requiring Miranda Warnings Even Though Prearrest Interview Occurred in Teen Suspect’s Home, Dec. 15, 2021. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.