Skip navigation

U.S. v. Bicaksiz, No. 98-1576 (2nd Cir.) (194 F.3d 390) (October 15, 1999) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)

In this case, the defendant, who was convicted after trial, claimed that his counsel had been ineffective in not advising him that, if he was convicted after trial, he would be subject to consecutive sentences on some of the charges. He claimed that had he been aware of that fact ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login