Palermo v. U.S., No. 471 (U.S. Supreme Court) (360 U.S. 343; 79 S.Ct. 1217) (June 22, 2059) (Justice Frankfurter)
In his concurring opinion, Justice Brennan stated: "Congress had no thought to invade the traditional discretion of trial judges in evidentiary matters beyond checking extravagant interpretations of our decision in Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657, which were said to have been made by some lower courts. Indeed Congress ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login