Skip navigation

Clymore v. U.S., No. 97-2319 (10th Cir.) (164 F.3d 569) (January 6, 1999) (Judge David M. Ebel)

Here the Court disagreed with the holding in Boero v. DEA, 111 F.3d 301 (2nd Cir. 1997) that when the claimant clearly did not receive proper notice of the forfeiture, a hearing on the merits is available in the district court. It stated: "We respectfully disagree with the Second Circuit's ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login