Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rostoff, No. 97-1940 (1st Cir.) (164 F.3d 63) (January 7, 1999) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)

The issue in this case was whether a defendant can be compelled to make payments of restitution beyond the expiration of his term of probation. The defendants in this case were convicted of bank fraud in 1993 and they were ordered to make restitution payments to the FDIC in an ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login