Skip navigation

DeLisle v. Rivers, No. 96-1198 (6th Cir.) (161 F.3d 370) (November 30, 1998) (Judge James L. Ryan)

En Banc decsion essentally affirming panel's decision that bias could not be presumed from jurors' knowledge of defendant's suppressed statements where none of those actually seated was challenged for cause or expressed fixed opinion about guilt.

In rendering its decision in this case [as well as in the prior decision ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login