Skip navigation

U.S. v. Gomes, No. 97-2193 (1st Cir.) (177 F.3d 76) (May 27, 1999) (Judge Michael Boudin)

The First Circuit also noted that it seemd that the rebuke was "amply justified" because counsel appeared to have ignored several warnings to stop arguing after various rulings were made. The Court then continued: "One caveat is in order. Most of the district court's concerns were with unwarranted argument by ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login