Skip navigation

U.S. v. Hopper, No. 97-10445 (9th Cir.) (177 F.3d 824) (May 20, 1999) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)

Here, although the Court agreed that, by subtracting penalties and interest from the amount of the loss, the resulting loss failed to adequately addess the nature of the crime, it held it was confined by the plain language of USSG ยง 2T1.1.

One of the issues addressed in this case ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login