Skip navigation

U.S. v. Padilla, No. 98-1411 (2nd Cir.) (186 F.3d 136) (July 14, 1999) (Judge John R. Gibson)

Here the Court held that the district court erred in allowing the Government to withdraw its ยง 5K1.1 motion after the defendant was convicted of a new crime, because it had not specifically reserved that remedy in its plea agreement.

While the holding in this case is narrow, it does ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login