Skip navigation

U.S. v. Wilson, No. 98-1906 (8th Cir.) (177 F.3d 712) (June 2, 1999) (Judge Pasco M. II Bowman)

Here the Court held that testimony about the defendant's prior drug running activities was not prior bad act evidence, but evidence of the charged conspiracy.

Citing cases the Court held that " 'Bad acts that form the factual setting of the crime at issue' or that 'form an integral part ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login