Scott v. U.S., No. 76-6767 (U.S. Supreme Court) (436 U.S. 128; 98 S.Ct. 1717) (May 15, 1978) (Justice Rehnquist)
Although the majority approved the wiretaps in question, Justice Brennan, in his dissent, commented: "The "minimization provision" of 2518 (5) provides, inter alia, that every order authorizing interception of wire communications include a requirement that the interception "shall be conducted in such a way as to minimize the interception of ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login