Ross v. Oklahoma, No. 86-5309 (U.S. Supreme Court) (487 U.S. 81; 108 S.Ct. 2273) (June 22, 1988) (Justice Rehnquist)
In this capital murder case, the Court denied the defendant's claim that his rights were violated because he was required to use a peremptory challenge for a juror who should have been removed for cause because the right to peremptory challenges is not of constitutional dimension.
Here the Court ruled ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login