Skip navigation

U.S. v. Gilbert, No. 97-1792 (6th Cir.) (173 F.3d 974) (April 2, 1999) (Judge David A. Nelson)

Over the dissent of Judge Coffman, the Court rejected the defendant's claim that two prior crack transactions shoiuld not have been included as relevant conduct in determining his sentence for selling .14 grams of crack to an undercover agent.

Here the Court affirmed the district court's finding that the defendant ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login