U.S. v. James Daniel Good Real Property, No. 92-1180 (U.S. Supreme Court) (510 U.S. 43; 114 S.Ct. 492) (December 13, 1993) (Justice Kennedy)
In this case the Court specifically held that "the seizure of real property . . . Is not one of those extraordinary instances that justify the postponement of notice and hearing. Unless exigent circumstances are present, the Due Process Clause requires the Government to afford notice and a meaningful opportunity ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login