Skip navigation

McKee v. U.S., No. 97-2671(L) (2nd Cir.) (167 F.3d 103) (February 2, 1999) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)

Here the defendant contended that the district court erred in concluding that he was not prejudice by the failure of his appellate counsel to challenge the trial court's incorrect definition of reasonable doubt and its incorrect statement that the jury could convict even if there was a reasonable doubt. The ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login