Rodriguez v. Cook, No. 97-35095 (9th Cir.) (169 F.3d 1176) (February 25, 1999) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
Loaded on March 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
March 08, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Three Strikes Statutes/Rule.
The Court reasoned that since the restriction neither involves a "suspect class" nor infringes upon a fundamental interest, it is subject to the "rational basis" test. The Court also concluded that IFP status is a privilege, not a right.
Here the 9th Circuit held that the "three strikes" provision of ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Hawkins v. Freeman, No. 96-7539 (4th Cir.) (166 F.3d 267) (January 20, 1999) (Judge Francis D. Jr. Murnaghan)
- Norwood v. Bain, No. 96-2164 (4th Cir.) (166 F.3d 243) (January 8, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Murgas, No. 95-CR-384 (N.D.N.Y.) (31 F.Supp.2d 245) (December 15, 1998) (Judge Howard G. Munson)
- Rodriguez v. Cook, No. 97-35095 (9th Cir.) (169 F.3d 1176) (February 25, 1999) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Ramsey, No. 97-3100 (D.C. Cir.) (165 F.3d 980) (February 8, 1999) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
- U.S. v. McDonald, No. 97-5474 (6th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1032) (January 21, 1999) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. 98-1001 (2nd Cir.) (166 F.3d 75) (January 22, 1999) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
- Malone v. Calderon, No. 98-99035 (9th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1234) (January 6, 1999) (Judge Robert R. Beezer)
- U.S. v. Harris, No. 96-10416 (9th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1277) (February 4, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Harris, No. 97-6283 (6th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1062) (January 26, 1999) (Judge David A. Nelson)
- U.S. v. Mercer, No. 97-3224 (11th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1331) (January 25, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. 98-1001 (2nd Cir.) (166 F.3d 75) (January 22, 1999) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
- U.S. v. Fischer, No. 96-3587 (11th Cir.) (168 F.3d 1273) (March 4, 1999) (Judge Frank May Hull)
- U.S. v. Iasiello, No. 97-7339 (3rd Cir.) (166 F.3d 212) (January 22, 1999) (Judge Jane R. Roth)
- U.S. v. Clavijo, No. 97-5197 (11th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1341) (January 29, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Hall, No. 97-4032 (7th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1095) (January 19, 1999) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Hall, No. 97-4032 (7th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1095) (January 19, 1999) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Sudikoff, No. CR-97-1176 (C.D.Cal.) (36 F.Supp.2d 1196) (March 2, 1999) (Judge Dean D. Pregerson)
More from these topics:
- Third Circuit: Pennsylvania Conviction for First-Degree Aggravated Assault Does Not Require Physical Force so Is Not Qualifying Predicate for ACCA Purposes, Dec. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Three Strikes, Career Offenders, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Recidivist Enhancements.
- Supreme Court of California: After Amendments to Three Strikes Law, Courts Retain Concurrent Sentencing Discretion for Qualifying Offenses Committed on Same Occasion or Arising From Same Operative Facts, Sept. 1, 2023. Three Strikes, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Army Veteran Serving Life Without Parole for Taking $9, June 15, 2020. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Veterans, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule.
- Ninth Circuit: Proposition 47 Creates New, Intervening Judgment to Allow Another Federal Habeas Petition Attacking Entire Case, April 15, 2020. Three Strikes Statutes/Rule.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.