Skip navigation

U.S. v. Hall, No. 97-4032 (7th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1095) (January 19, 1999) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)

Here the Court emphasized that its long-standing presumption against the admissibility of expert testimony on eyewitness identifications stemmed from its concerns about whether such expert testimony would actually assist the trier of fact, rather than concerns about the reliablity of such testimony. In its decision, the Court also identified three ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login