U.S. v. Harris, No. 96-10416 (9th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1277) (February 4, 1999) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on March 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
March 08, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Mandatory Minimums.
While the full court voted not to rehear en banc its previous decision reported at 154 F.3d 1082, Judge Kozinski ripped into the judges who wrote that decision, accusing them of being disrespectful to Congress for criticizing mandatory minimum laws.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Hawkins v. Freeman, No. 96-7539 (4th Cir.) (166 F.3d 267) (January 20, 1999) (Judge Francis D. Jr. Murnaghan)
- Norwood v. Bain, No. 96-2164 (4th Cir.) (166 F.3d 243) (January 8, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Murgas, No. 95-CR-384 (N.D.N.Y.) (31 F.Supp.2d 245) (December 15, 1998) (Judge Howard G. Munson)
- Rodriguez v. Cook, No. 97-35095 (9th Cir.) (169 F.3d 1176) (February 25, 1999) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Ramsey, No. 97-3100 (D.C. Cir.) (165 F.3d 980) (February 8, 1999) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
- U.S. v. McDonald, No. 97-5474 (6th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1032) (January 21, 1999) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. 98-1001 (2nd Cir.) (166 F.3d 75) (January 22, 1999) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
- Malone v. Calderon, No. 98-99035 (9th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1234) (January 6, 1999) (Judge Robert R. Beezer)
- U.S. v. Harris, No. 96-10416 (9th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1277) (February 4, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Harris, No. 97-6283 (6th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1062) (January 26, 1999) (Judge David A. Nelson)
- U.S. v. Mercer, No. 97-3224 (11th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1331) (January 25, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. 98-1001 (2nd Cir.) (166 F.3d 75) (January 22, 1999) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
- U.S. v. Fischer, No. 96-3587 (11th Cir.) (168 F.3d 1273) (March 4, 1999) (Judge Frank May Hull)
- U.S. v. Iasiello, No. 97-7339 (3rd Cir.) (166 F.3d 212) (January 22, 1999) (Judge Jane R. Roth)
- U.S. v. Clavijo, No. 97-5197 (11th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1341) (January 29, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Hall, No. 97-4032 (7th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1095) (January 19, 1999) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Hall, No. 97-4032 (7th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1095) (January 19, 1999) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Sudikoff, No. CR-97-1176 (C.D.Cal.) (36 F.Supp.2d 1196) (March 2, 1999) (Judge Dean D. Pregerson)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit: District Court Miscalculated Sentencing Guidelines Range by Implausibly Finding Defendant Would Use All Cash Proceeds of Drug Sales Seized to Purchase More Meth to Resell, July 15, 2022. War on Drugs, Mandatory Minimums.
- Second Circuit: District Court Required to Explain Rationale for Reducing Sentence to ‘Time Served’ Under First Step Act but Refused to Reduce Supervised Release Portion of Sentence Despite Being Longer Than New Mandatory Minimum, March 15, 2022. First Step Act, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Mandatory Minimums.
- SCOTUS: § 2(a) of Fair Sentencing Act Modifies Statutory Penalties Only for Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)— the Mandatory-Minimum Provisions, Sept. 15, 2021. Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Mandatory Minimums.
- Federal Judge: ‘Offense of Conviction’ Under Guidelines Excludes Relevant Conduct for Sentencing, Sept. 15, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Minimums.
- Session’s Directive to Seek Harshest Sentencing Rescinded, Feb. 16, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mandatory Minimums.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.