Skip navigation

U.S. v. Harris, No. 96-10416 (9th Cir.) (165 F.3d 1277) (February 4, 1999) (Per Curiam)

While the full court voted not to rehear en banc its previous decision reported at 154 F.3d 1082, Judge Kozinski ripped into the judges who wrote that decision, accusing them of being disrespectful to Congress for criticizing mandatory minimum laws.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login