U.S. v. Sudikoff, No. CR-97-1176 (C.D.Cal.) (36 F.Supp.2d 1196) (March 2, 1999) (Judge Dean D. Pregerson)
With the demise of Singleton-type arguments, defense counsel must once again use the old-fashioned methods to attack the credibility of accomplice and informant witnesses. This is a significant case which teaches an important lesson, namely that, by using the teachings of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Giglio ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login