Skip navigation

U.S. v. Sudikoff, No. CR-97-1176 (C.D.Cal.) (36 F.Supp.2d 1196) (March 2, 1999) (Judge Dean D. Pregerson)

With the demise of Singleton-type arguments, defense counsel must once again use the old-fashioned methods to attack the credibility of accomplice and informant witnesses. This is a significant case which teaches an important lesson, namely that, by using the teachings of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Giglio …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login