Skip navigation

U.S. v. Gantley, No. 97-6027 (6th Cir.) (172 F.3d 422) (March 30, 1999) (Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley)

Here the Court held that the Double Jerpardy Clause did not bar a new trial of the defendant following a mistrial, both because it found that the defendant had given his implied consent to the mistrial and because of manifest necessity.

Citing its decision in Watkins v. Kassulke, 90 F.3d …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login