U.S. v. Gantley, No. 97-6027 (6th Cir.) (172 F.3d 422) (March 30, 1999) (Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley)
Here the Court held that the Double Jerpardy Clause did not bar a new trial of the defendant following a mistrial, both because it found that the defendant had given his implied consent to the mistrial and because of manifest necessity.
Citing its decision in Watkins v. Kassulke, 90 F.3d ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Richardson v. U.S., No. 97-8629 (U.S. Supreme Court) (526 U.S. 813; 119 S.Ct. 1707) (June 1, 1999) (Justice Breyer)
- U.S. v. De Varon, No. 96-5421 (11th Cir.) (175 F.3d 930) (May 14, 1999) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Valencia-Gonzales, No. 98-20144 (5th Cir.) (172 F.3d 344) (April 9, 1999) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Gergen, No. 97-30324 (9th Cir.) (172 F.3d 719) (April 16, 1999) (Judge Robert M. Takasugi)
- U.S. v. Forbes, No. 98-10259 (9th Cir.) (172 F.3d 675) (April 1, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. Espinosa, No. 96-5208 (11th Cir.) (172 F.3d 795) (April 15, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Gantley, No. 97-6027 (6th Cir.) (172 F.3d 422) (March 30, 1999) (Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 97-1143(L) (2nd Cir.) (172 F.3d 129) (March 19, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Cerceda, No. 95-4628 (11th Cir.) (172 F.3d 806) (April 16, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Espinosa, No. 96-5208 (11th Cir.) (172 F.3d 795) (April 15, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Valencia-Gonzales, No. 98-20144 (5th Cir.) (172 F.3d 344) (April 9, 1999) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Hendrick, No. 97-1512 (6th Cir.) (177 F.3d 547) (May 21, 1999) (Judge John T. Nixon)
- U.S. v. Clayton, No. 97-60712 (5th Cir.) (172 F.3d 347) (April 12, 1999) (Judge E. Grady Jolly)
- U.S. v. Woodard, No. 98-30045 (9th Cir.) (172 F.3d 717) (April 8, 1999) (Judge William W. Schwarzer)
- U.S. v. Dispoz-O-Plastics, Inc., No. 98-1135 (3rd Cir.) (172 F.3d 275) (April 8, 1999) (Judge Jane R. Roth)
- U.S. v. Herman, No. 98-1391 (2nd Cir.) (172 F.3d 205) (March 30, 1999) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin)
- U.S. v. Mancillas, No. 98-40700 (5th Cir.) (172 F.3d 341) (April 9, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Valencia-Gonzales, No. 98-20144 (5th Cir.) (172 F.3d 344) (April 9, 1999) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 97-1143(L) (2nd Cir.) (172 F.3d 129) (March 19, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez De Varon, No. 96-5421 (11th Cir.) (175 F.3d 930) (May 14, 1999) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Bach, No. 98-3403 (7th Cir.) (172 F.3d 520) (April 16, 1999) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
More from these topics:
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.
- U.S. v. Pineda-Mateo, No. 17-1857 (1st Cir.) (905 F.3d 13) (September 18, 2018) (Judge Juan R. Torruella), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Joint Participant.