Skip navigation

U.S. v. Gantley, No. 97-6027 (6th Cir.) (172 F.3d 422) (March 30, 1999) (Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley)

Here the Court held that the Double Jerpardy Clause did not bar a new trial of the defendant following a mistrial, both because it found that the defendant had given his implied consent to the mistrial and because of manifest necessity.

Citing its decision in Watkins v. Kassulke, 90 F.3d ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login