Skip navigation

U.S. v. Kaplan, No. 95-4908 (11th Cir.) (171 F.3d 1351) (April 9, 1999) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)

The Court also expressly overruled its decision in U.S. v. De Parias, 805 F.3d 1447 (11th Cir. 1986), to the extent that it implied that the Government must prove some "adverse" effect on commerce. Citing the plain language of the statute, the Court stated "The Act's language is broad, and ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login