Skip navigation

U.S. v. Chambers, No. 97-5501 (3rd Cir.) (192 F.3d 374) (September 13, 1999) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)

Here the Court rejected the Government's contention that a motion for return of property under Rule 41(e) is moot where the Government no longer retains possession of the seized property - i.e., it no longer has anything to return.

The Court set forth the issue as follows: "The government asserts ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login