Skip navigation

U.S. v. Duran, No. 98-50116 (9th Cir.) (189 F.3d 1071) (August 31, 1999) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)

Here, affirming that the granting of use immunity to a witness is an executive, not a judicial, function, the Court denied the defendant's request for an order compelling such immunity, explaining the limited circumstances under which a court may act.

In this case the Court affirmed a district court ruling ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login