Skip navigation

U.S. v. Farhad, No. 97-10044 (9th Cir.) (190 F.3d 1097) (September 13, 1999) (Per Curiam)

This is an interesting case that deals with the dangers of a defendant acting pro se. Here, the Ninth Circuit rejected a defense claim that the defendant had not knowingly, intelligently and unequivocally waived his right to counsel, and thus affirmed the defendant’s mail fraud conviction. Judge Reinhardt concurred on …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login