Skip navigation

U.S. v. Farhad, No. 97-10044 (9th Cir.) (190 F.3d 1097) (September 13, 1999) (Per Curiam)

This is an interesting case that deals with the dangers of a defendant acting pro se. Here, the Ninth Circuit rejected a defense claim that the defendant had not knowingly, intelligently and unequivocally waived his right to counsel, and thus affirmed the defendant’s mail fraud conviction. Judge Reinhardt concurred on ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login