Skip navigation

U.S. v. Romero-Rendon, No. 99-50137 (9th Cir.) (198 F.3d 745) (December 7, 1999) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)

For some time now the courts have struggled with the concept of whether the normal preponderance of evidence standard that applies to sentencing hearings is sufficient when the application of a particular enhancement results in a dramatic increase in the defendant’s sentence. While the Supreme Court has been silent on ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login