Skip navigation

U.S. v. Valdez, No. 98-35526 (9th Cir.) (195 F.3d 544) (November 12, 1999) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)

Defendant's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion was held to be timely under § 2255 (3).

In this case, the defendant Valdez filed a post conviction petition for relief that the district court construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissed as untimely. On appeal the court held that ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login