Cabello v. U.S., No. 98-1543 (7th Cir.) (188 F.3d 871) (August 18, 1999) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
October 25, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Conflict of Interest.
In this case, the defendant was first represented by court-appointed counsel. On the eve of trial, another lawyer appeared and announced that he would be representing the defendant. Neither the judge, the prosecutor, nor the defendant knew that the leader of the alleged drug conspiracy was paying his law firm. ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Williams v. Taylor, No. 99-1 (4th Cir.) (189 F.3d 421) (August 2, 1999) (Judge J. Harvie III Wilkinson)
- U.S. v. Bin Laden, No. S(6) 98 Crim.1023 (LBS) (S.D.N.Y.) (58 F.Supp.2d 113) (June 30, 1999) (Judge Leonard B. Sand)
- Mauro v. Arpaio, No. 97-16021 (9th Cir.) (188 F.3d 1054) (August 17, 1999) (Judge Thomas G. Nelson)
- U.S. v. Vega, No. 98-50548 (9th Cir.) (188 F.3d 1150) (August 26, 1999) (Judge Raner C. Collins)
- U.S. v. Matos-Rodriguez, No. 98-4741 (11th Cir.) (188 F.3d 1300) (September 17, 1999) (Judge C. Lynwood Jr. Smith)
- U.S. v. Torres-Del Muro, No. 98-30096 (C.D.Ill.) (58 F.Supp.2d 931) (July 20, 1999) (Judge Richard Mills)
- Pichardo v. I.N.S., No. 98-70759 (9th Cir.) (216 F.3d 1198) (July 7, 2000) (Judge Donald P. Lay)
- U.S. v. Heath, No. 98-3484 (7th Cir.) (188 F.3d 916) (August 26, 1999) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)
- U.S. v. Brings Plenty, No. 98-4037 (8th Cir.) (188 F.3d 1051) (September 1, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Heath, No. 98-3484 (7th Cir.) (188 F.3d 916) (August 26, 1999) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)
- U.S. v. Drapeau, No. 97-4163 (8th Cir.) (188 F.3d 987) (August 20, 1999) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- U.S. v. Ficke, No. 8:98CR201 (D.Neb.) (58 F.Supp.2d 1071) (July 16, 1999) (Judge Joseph F. Bataillon)
- U.S. v. Bradbury, No. 98-1556 (2nd Cir.) (189 F.3d 200) (August 16, 1999) (Judge James L. Oakes)
- Cabello v. U.S., No. 98-1543 (7th Cir.) (188 F.3d 871) (August 18, 1999) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Dakota, No. 97-2256 (6th Cir.) (197 F.3d 821) (December 17, 1999) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)
- Bowen v. Roe, No. 98-56308 (9th Cir.) (188 F.3d 1157) (August 30, 1999) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)
- U.S. v. Yazzie, No. 98-2149 (10th Cir.) (188 F.3d 1178) (August 10, 1999) (Judge John C. Porfilio)
- U.S. v. Juan, No. Crim. 98-10233-NG (D.Mass.) (59 F.Supp.2d 210) (July 29, 1999) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
More from these topics:
- Massachusetts Supreme Court: Defense Counsel’s Overt Bias Against Own Client Constitutes Actual Conflict of Interest Requiring New Trial Without Need to Prove Prejudice, Dec. 15, 2023. Counsel - Constructive denial of, Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel.
- Texas Prosecutor Spent 20-Year Career Also Working as Law Clerk to Judges He Appeared Before, May 5, 2022. Attorney Misconduct, Conflict of Interest.
- Arizona Supreme Court: Trial Court’s Failure to Protect Defendant’s Right to Conflict-Free Counsel May Be Raised on Direct Appeal 16 Massachusetts Supreme Court: Error to Exclude Expert Testimony on Significance of Tattoo to Support Claim of Self-Defense, Aug. 15, 2021. Appealable Issues/Orders, Conflict of Interest.
- D.C. Circuit: Conflicted Counsel During Habeas Proceeding Requires Appointment of Conflict-Free Counsel, June 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, Conflict of Interest.
- "Kentucky Supreme Court: Hearing on Defense Counsel’s Fitness Is Critical Stage at Which Defendant Has Right to Be Present With Conflict-Free Counsel", March 15, 2021. Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.