U.S. v. Gomez, No. 98-2160 (10th Cir.) (191 F.3d 1214) (September 3, 1999) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
October 04, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Declarant Unavailable Exception.
Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Lilly v. Virginia, 119 S.Ct. 1887 (1999), the Court concluded that the statements in question neither fell into a "firmly rooted" exception to the hearsay rule nor possessed sufficient indicia of trustworthiness to be admitted - and its decision contains a good analysis ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Fiduccia v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, No. 97-16420 (9th Cir.) (185 F.3d 1035) (August 4, 1999) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
- Bennett v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. Civ.A. 98-745(GK) (D.D.C.) (55 F.Supp.2d 36) (June 30, 1999) (Judge Gladys Kessler)
- U.S. v. Anderson, No. 99-MC-305-JWL (D.Kan.) (55 F.Supp.2d 1163) (May 7, 1999) (Judge John W. Lungstrum)
- Moore v. Reno, No. 98-55588 (9th Cir.) (185 F.3d 1054) (August 5, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- Warren v. Crabtree, No. 98-35890 (9th Cir.) (185 F.3d 1018) (July 30, 1999) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- U.S. v. Warren, No. 98-6488 (3rd Cir.) (186 F.3d 358) (July 21, 1999) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- Warren v. Crabtree, No. 98-35890 (9th Cir.) (185 F.3d 1018) (July 30, 1999) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- Ferguson v. City of Charleston, S.C., No. 97-2512 (4th Cir.) (186 F.3d 469) (July 13, 1999) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Gomez, No. 98-2160 (10th Cir.) (191 F.3d 1214) (September 3, 1999) (Judge Robert H. Henry)
- U.S. v. Mikalajunas, No. 98-4002 (4th Cir.) (186 F.3d 490) (July 21, 1999) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Warren, No. 98-6488 (3rd Cir.) (186 F.3d 358) (July 21, 1999) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- U.S. v. Warren, No. 98-6488 (3rd Cir.) (186 F.3d 358) (July 21, 1999) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- U.S. v. Hernandez-Wilson, No. 98-1212 (1st Cir.) (186 F.3d 1) (July 23, 1999) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
- U.S. v. Manske, No. 98-4245 (7th Cir.) (186 F.3d 770) (July 9, 1999) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Crawford, No. 98-30222 (9th Cir.) (185 F.3d 1024) (August 2, 1999) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
- Bennett v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. Civ.A. 98-745(GK) (D.D.C.) (55 F.Supp.2d 36) (June 30, 1999) (Judge Gladys Kessler)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 98-50157 (9th Cir.) (185 F.3d 945) (May 28, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Brugal, No. 98-4255 (4th Cir.) (185 F.3d 205) (July 19, 1999) (Judge Francis D. Jr. Murnaghan)
More from these topics:
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals: Speculation Insufficient to Trigger ‘Forfeiture by Wrongdoing’ Exception to Confrontation Clause, May 15, 2021. Forfeiture By Wrongdoing, Declarant Unavailable Exception.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.