Hatch v. District of Columbia, No. 96-7247 (D.C. Cir.) (184 F.3d 846) (July 30, 1999) (Judge David S. Tatel)
The Court started this decision by stating: "Under Sandin v. Conner, segregative confinement in prison implicates a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution only if it 'imposes atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.' ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login