Hatch v. District of Columbia, No. 96-7247 (D.C. Cir.) (184 F.3d 846) (July 30, 1999) (Judge David S. Tatel)
Here the Court sharply limited a broad interpretation of the Supreme Court's use of "atypical and siginficant hardships" as used in Sandin v. Conner, and noted that it should be compared to the most restrictive conditions that exist.
The Court started this decision by stating: "Under Sandin v. Conner, segregative ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login