Skip navigation

U.S. v. Earnest, No. 98-3020 (7th Cir.) (185 F.3d 808) (July 21, 1999) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)

In its previous decision, reported at 129 F.3d 906, this case was remanded back to the district court for a determination whether the Government had proved the drug was crack for sentencing purposes, even though the defendant had earlier admitted it was crack. It was acknowldged that the Government's expert ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login