U.S. v. Torrez-Ortega, No. 97-8094 (10th Cir.) (184 F.3d 1128) (July 1, 1999) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
September 27, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony.
here the Court held that a witness who asserts an illegitimate claim of privilege and refuses to answer questions at trial is not sufficiently "available" for cross-examination to satisfy the requirements of the Confrontation Clause.
The Court held that if a witness refuses to answer questions, the district court must ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Gillespie v. City of Indianapolis, No. 98-2691 (7th Cir.) (185 F.3d 693) (July 9, 1999) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Rice, No. 98-51054 (5th Cir.) (185 F.3d 326) (August 12, 1999) (Judge Reynaldo G. Garza)
- U.S. v. Cantu, No. 98-40799 (5th Cir.) (185 F.3d 298) (August 11, 1999) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Ramos, No. 98-50536 (9th Cir.) (184 F.3d 1055) (July 29, 1999) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Earnest, No. 98-3020 (7th Cir.) (185 F.3d 808) (July 21, 1999) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Torrez-Ortega, No. 97-8094 (10th Cir.) (184 F.3d 1128) (July 1, 1999) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
- Martinez v. Albuquerque, No. 98-2235 (10th Cir.) (184 F.3d 1123) (June 15, 1999) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Worley, No. 97-6374 (6th Cir.) (193 F.3d 381) (September 29, 1999) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- U.S. v. Alegria, No. 98-1976 (1st Cir.) (192 F.3d 179) (September 30, 1999) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Ramos, No. 98-50536 (9th Cir.) (184 F.3d 1055) (July 29, 1999) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Yankowski, No. 98-30237 (9th Cir.) (184 F.3d 1071) (July 7, 1999) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- Hatch v. District of Columbia, No. 96-7247 (D.C. Cir.) (184 F.3d 846) (July 30, 1999) (Judge David S. Tatel)
- Hatch v. District of Columbia, No. 96-7247 (D.C. Cir.) (184 F.3d 846) (July 30, 1999) (Judge David S. Tatel)
- Zadvydas v. Underdown, No. 97-31345 (5th Cir.) (185 F.3d 279) (August 11, 1999) (Judge Will L. Garwood)
- Gillespie v. City of Indianapolis, No. 98-2691 (7th Cir.) (185 F.3d 693) (July 9, 1999) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- Zadvydas v. Underdown, No. 97-31345 (5th Cir.) (185 F.3d 279) (August 11, 1999) (Judge Will L. Garwood)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 98-2517 (7th Cir.) (185 F.3d 765) (July 16, 1999) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
More from these topics:
- The Daniel Buffington Dilemma: Does His Expert Witness Testimony Satisfy Daubert?, Aug. 1, 2023. Death Penalty/Death Row, Daubert Standards, Expert and Opinion Testimony, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony.
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Withholding Exculpatory Statement Change by Key Witness Constitutes Brady Violation, Requiring New Trial, Sept. 15, 2021. Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Evidence - Failure to Disclose.
- California Court of Appeal Overturns Child Sex Abuse Convictions Based on Prosecution’s Violation of Brady Obligations by Withholding Witness Impeachment Evidence, March 15, 2021. Sexual Exploitation of Minors, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Evidence - Failure to Disclose.
- Third Circuit: No Categorical Ban on Reliability of Recantations as New Evidence, Dec. 15, 2020. Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony.
- Fifth Circuit Grants Habeas Relief Because Detective’s Testimony of Witness Identification of Defendant Violates Confrontation Clause, Oct. 15, 2020. Habeas Corpus, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.