Skip navigation

Romandine v. U.S., No. 99-1940 (7th Cir.) (206 F.3d 731) (March 14, 2000) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)

Here the Court added to a Circuit split in holding that a district court may not, under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a), require that its sentence be served consecutively to a state sentence that will be imposed in the future. In renedering its decision, the Court observed: "Other ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login