Smith v. Groose, No. 97-2694 (8th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1045) (March 7, 2000) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
Loaded on April 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
April 17, 2000
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists.
In this case the Eighth Circuit held that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause does not permit prosecutors to use theories that are inherently contradictory in terms of their facts as a way of convicting two defendants of the same crime in separate trials. The petitioner's convictions arose from a ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Deleveaux, No. 98-5685 (11th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1292) (March 9, 2000) (Judge Frank May Hull)
- Lanier v. U.S., No. 98-2689 (7th Cir.) (205 F.3d 958) (February 9, 2000) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- Lanier v. U.S., No. 98-2689 (7th Cir.) (205 F.3d 958) (February 9, 2000) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- Amos v. Maryland Dept. of Public Safety, No. 96-7091 (4th Cir.) (205 F.3d 687) (March 6, 2000) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Tappin, No. 99-1439 (2nd Cir.) (205 F.3d 536) (March 9, 2000) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- Humanitarian Law Project v. Reno, No. 98-56062 (9th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1130) (March 3, 2000) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 98-4208 (4th Cir.) (205 F.3d 720) (March 7, 2000) (Judge M. Blane Michael)
- U.S. v. Fernandez, No. 98-1146 (7th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1020) (March 9, 2000) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Brugal, No. 98-4255 (4th Cir.) (209 F.3d 353) (April 4, 2000) (Judge Clyde H. Hamilton)
- U.S. v. Miller, No. 99-10094 (9th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1098) (March 8, 2000) (Judge Myron H. Bright)
- U.S. v. Lopez-Soto, No. 99-50201 (9th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1101) (March 8, 2000) (Judge William A. Fletcher)
- Smith v. Groose, No. 97-2694 (8th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1045) (March 7, 2000) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
- U.S. v. Kubick, No. 98-30082 (9th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1117) (December 10, 1999) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- Scott v. Clay County, Tn., No. 98-6157 (6th Cir.) (205 F.3d 867) (March 1, 2000) (Judge Robert B. Krupansky)
- U.S. v. Universal Rehabilitation Services, Inc., No. 97-1412 (3rd Cir.) (205 F.3d 657) (March 14, 2000) (Judge Leonard I. Garth)
- U.S. v. Hasan, No. 99-2102 (8th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1072) (February 29, 2000) (Judge George G. Fagg)
- U.S. v. Saling, No. 99-40411 (5th Cir.) (205 F.3d 764) (February 29, 2000) (Judge Henry A. Politz)
- U.S. v. Ranger Electronic Communications, Inc., No. 98-2255 (6th Cir.) (210 F.3d 627) (April 24, 2000) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)
- McClary v. Coughlin, No. 90-CV-0501A (W.D.N.Y.) (87 F.Supp.2d 205) (March 14, 2000) (Judge Magistrate)
- U.S. v. Mandanici, No. 99-2059 (2nd Cir.) (205 F.3d 519) (February 23, 2000) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
More from these topics:
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.
- U.S. v. Pineda-Mateo, No. 17-1857 (1st Cir.) (905 F.3d 13) (September 18, 2018) (Judge Juan R. Torruella), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Joint Participant.