Skip navigation

U.S. v. Fernandez, No. 98-1146 (7th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1020) (March 9, 2000) (Judge William J. Bauer)

Here, while acknowledging that Rule 11 does not require "literal compliance," a failure to advise the defendant that he faced a mandatory minimium sentence was error that was not harmless.

In this case, the defendant complained, inter alia, that the district court had failed to adequately inform him of the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login