Skip navigation

U.S. v. Fernandez, No. 98-1146 (7th Cir.) (205 F.3d 1020) (March 9, 2000) (Judge William J. Bauer)

Here, while acknowledging that Rule 11 does not require "literal compliance," a failure to advise the defendant that he faced a mandatory minimium sentence was error that was not harmless.

In this case, the defendant complained, inter alia, that the district court had failed to adequately inform him of the …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login