U.S. v. Ocana, No. 98-41133 (5th Cir.) (204 F.3d 585) (February 18, 2000) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
This case is noted principally for Judge Politz' dissent where he objected to the defendant's almost three-fold increase in her sentence based on the testimony of two co-conspirators whose testimony was filled with "multiple inconsistencies".
The principal issue raised in this appeal was whether the district court had erred by …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login