Skip navigation

U.S. v. Ocana, No. 98-41133 (5th Cir.) (204 F.3d 585) (February 18, 2000) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

This case is noted principally for Judge Politz' dissent where he objected to the defendant's almost three-fold increase in her sentence based on the testimony of two co-conspirators whose testimony was filled with "multiple inconsistencies".

The principal issue raised in this appeal was whether the district court had erred by ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login